Showing posts with label Film Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Film Reviews. Show all posts

Sunday, 2 November 2008

Quantum of Solace review by McLeron

Quantum of Solace and Gromit

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Quantum of Solace in ten words or less: Bond is back to answer hanging questions from Casino Royale

The last real eagerly awaited film of 2008 falls short of expectations and attempts to ape the Bourne trilogy by having the action scenes tell a story. While the pacing of the film is totally engaging, the film is generally unsatisfying. The plot sees Bond trying to solve the identity of the villains who coerced dead ex-lover Vesper to betrayal. He comes across a secret organisation whose identity is thrown away rather glibly by the ominous Mr White (who was kneecapped by 007 in Casino Royale) and is led to pursue Dominic Greene, a weedy environmentalist who plans to profit from drying up water in the desert.

Generally what sets a Bond film apart from other action films are the gadgets, the car, and the little Bondian touches which give weight to the charisma of the lead, such as the scene in Casino Royale where Bond wins a knife struggle by using the old ‘Look over there’ fake out. The gadgets are still gone, gone is the car, and there are few Bond-esque moments in the film, although there is a very entertaining one with a motor bike.

The film tends to disregard Bond fans by making unnecessary changes to the formula, like putting the gun barrel sequence at the end of the film instead of opening with it. Not only that, but also takes for granted that everyone in the audience is well-versed in the Bond universe as the film follows on from Casino Royale with little explanation or exposition on who Eva Green’s Vesper character is and her death, which is the driving force behind Bond in this film.

Because of this it does not seem that you can enjoy Quantum without having seen Casino Royale recently beforehand, as if the Bond series has become a package deal by necessity, which was never a case before. Taking into consideration the bald villain Blofeld who murdered 007’s wife in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service; in the following film, Diamonds Are Forever, Bond is tenaciously hunting for him with personal interest, but his wife is never mentioned. Diamonds Are Forever succeeds in not letting any member of the audience feel disorientated by Bond’s hunt, whereas Quantum fails.

The film is also unsatisfyingly short, and the shortest Bond film in the entire run at 100 minutes. And if you consider that Quantum runs on from Casino Royale, the longest in the series, it might have been more conducive if they saved Vesper’s death at the end of Casino for the beginning of Quantum. This holds particularly true as Casino Royale seems to end with her and Bond together, then has a random extra twenty minutes added on to kill her off…stick those twenty minutes at the beginning of this film, you would have two films with satisfying running times, rather than one extra long and one extra short.

We all know if you are making the 22nd film in a series, repeating ideas can become an easy mistake to make but did Neal Purvis and Robert Wade have to mimic the most enduring image in Bond history, the iconic scene from Goldfinger where Shirley Eaton’s Jill Masterson lies dead on a bed painted in gold (motor oil in this case)? Is this a rebuke to the capitalist desires of today? No longer do we desire gold, but oil? If they were trying to set up their own inventive, unique, and subtextually grabbing contributions to the Bond series, there are more plausible ways to create a shocking death, without sparking the ire of die hards.

I wish producers actually took time to craft a good film, rather that just setting release dates: that way Quantum’s poor CGI could have been bettered. Considering that all Quantum has going for it is the action, director Marc Foster really should have seen to it that it all looked thumbs up on screen.

The film is not without its good bits however. There is a scene where you see that 007’s boss M actually has to answer to someone, and that she has been defending Bond for years, maintaining that he ‘gets results’ which is a nice touch. Daniel Craig is adept at making 007 the witty, down-to-earth, cold-blooded killing machine we deserve. His patois with Judi Dench’s M is the best developed relationship in the series, and when they are on screen together deliver the film’s strongest moments. Olga Kurylenko, who looks reminiscent of Sophie Marceau’s Elektra King with a bad haircut just sulks in her role, lifted identically from Carole Boucquet’s Melinda Havelock from For Your Eyes Only and randomly gains a bogus foreign accent halfway through the film. The film lacks a threatening villain in Dominic Greene (Mathieu Almaric), a weak pale little man who looks like a cross between David Mitchell and Jools Holland and almost as threatening. At no point do we ever feel Bond is going to ‘meet his match’ as it were, whereas in 007 films of past we always had Bond cornered in a dire situation where if not for his wits and pain threshold would be dead.

Quantum of Solace lacks all this! But all you need to make a Bond film work is a guy who looks good in a tuxedo to have killer aim and a sexy car which fires missiles. As this film lacked the sexy car, we can only hope that they learn their lesson next time around. They have slipped up in the Bond universe, don’t even get me started on the abhorrent opening credits, but if its just plain balls to the wall action you are after, you won’t find much disappointment with Quantum.

Grading: B

Monday, 22 October 2007

The Heartbreak Kid by McLeron

Unbreak My Heartbreak Kid

The Heartbreak Kid in ten words or less: Eddie marries the wrong woman – with ‘hilarious’ results!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Ok, before you start reading this review, be prepared: This film features a vagina farting.

Still want to read on? Still want to watch it? Well, be prepared again – that isn’t even the horrible bit…

The Farrelly brothers have an impressive CV of writing and directing two out of the top five comedies of all time (No prizes for guessing which ones I’m referring to) but in recent years they’ve gone pretty soppy and tried giving their films cutesy ‘messages’ with the poor to average efforts of ‘Shallow Hal’ and ‘Stuck On You’, but the Farrelly brothers are back on form this time around with another madcap crazy gross comedy starring Ben Stiller. The Heartbreak Kid, whilst no Something About Mary, is an enjoyable madcap bound through the mundane and insane,

Eddie (Stiller) is a rejected pathetic weed who is moping around looking for romance and handily he chances upon a friendly, gold-hearted, stunning beauty called Lila (Malin Akerman) and due to some contrivances they end up marrying after 6 weeks. As soon as they are hitched and honeymooning, Eddie realises that his wife is just about the most messed up woman in the world; it’s like Just Married, but a million times better and funnier (which still isn’t saying much) Lila is in actual fact ludicrously stupid, using words like ‘inhabitate’, she is fucking petrifying in bed, and so, so, SO, annoying. I’d still buy ‘er a drink though. Having realised that he has made a pretty massive cock-up Eddie immediately falls in love with another woman and the traditional narrative of a rom-com kicks in: they exchange innuendoes, go on some themed date, have a montage of good times, a secret is discovered, then they get back together. It’s actually a lot better than I’ve made out, and here’s why:

Stiller’s funniest character for me, after White Goodman, is Tommy from Friends, a guy who is a fairly well-rounded person except that when alone with Ross Gellar, he turns in a sociopath, and there are moments in this film where Stiller has deliberately mimicked the rage he gave as Tommy, and the system of approach he has to the sheer absurdity of his ‘Curb Your Enthusiasm’-style circumstances is first-rate comedy. It compliments the film so well.

Malin is the best frigging character in this movie. At first I said to a buddy whilst watching her, she could be the new Diaz. After seeing her whole performance, she’s definitely the new Faris. The film just loses momentum without her, she’s like Kramer from Seinfeld, as soon as she’s in the scene, the audience’s attention multiplies because she’s so larger than life

No one really cares about the story and after the first ten minutes of spot the Arrested Development-er (three, btw) thanks to the aforementioned eccentricity of Lila, the film gathers pace, however ends with a saggy, but nonetheless funny third act.

A friend mentioned disapproval of how the film doesn’t typically have an ending, but I believe she’s being unfair, as it’s fairly well placed in this film, with a surprising cameo from Eva Longoria, the audience were in titters and it was understood that the film had done all it had to do.

Initially I was joking with another buddy, just four hours before watching the film, how I’d never watch it, but that goes to show how wrong I can be. Now I’m encouraging that buddy to go out and see it.This film is far more enjoyable when with friends, although I can hardly think of a time when I have enjoyed a ‘Gross-Out Movie’ by myself, can you? - and I’ve read a lot of internet reviews, this film is getting a lot of unimpressed submissions, but what on earth do these people expect? Film is a pile of piss compared to the brilliant programmes on TV at the moment like Dexter, Lost, Jericho. There is simply no time to make a great, character realistic explanatory series of events in just two hours. That’s why all these shows span on and on for series on end. Prison Break has been picked up for five seasons, Heroes for ten. QED.

Grade C+

Tuesday, 16 October 2007

Disturbia Review

Disturb-ia Enthusiasm

Disturbia in ten words or less: Tagged Kale discovers serial killer whilst perving on hot chick.



Horror movies suck. And you know what? - Hitchcock sucks as well. Master of Suspense? Master of the Sucky Ending. The Birds – what the hell? Any explanation? Psycho – staring at the fly on the wall: not an ending! Rear Window – a wheelchair bound perv defeats a murderer by taking pictures of him with the flash on; what is he, King Kong?

Not so much plucked as massaged gently from the story of Rear Window, we have a hybrid of a teen movie and a suspense thriller. The role of a modern day James Stewart is played by Shia LaBeouf (on my spell check that comes up as laboured. Huh.) and Grace Kelly has evolved into comedy Asian, Ronny, played by Aaron Yoo.

Thankfully the set up of Kale being ‘spatially challenged’ is established within the first ten minutes, after a shocking opening death, and some painfully realistic classroom troubles, he is confined to a summer of gaming, lounging, and wanking over hot girl next door, Ashley (Sarah Roemer), a girl whose window romping gets so exasperating you just feel like shouting ‘Do the curtains, love!’ at. After a few exercises in tedious voyeurism, Kale is suspect to observe his neighbour of suspicious activity, which eventually proves to be a concrete suspicion, and Kale ends up fighting for his mother’s life against the vicious psychopath.

What makes this movie better than most horror movies that are released today is that it doesn't rely on excessive gore and gross out tactics to frighten you. It relies on mood and suspense, which works so much better, which is why Hitchcock is bumlicked by all. As the film went on, the tension got so high that I was literally on the edge of my seat rubbing my hands together because I was so anxious to see what was going to happen next. You actually felt the adrenaline rush that the characters in the film must have been feeling when they were snooping around in the neighbour's garage. Disturbia has a very likeable cast and the acting and direction is of such good quality that the on screen chemistry between everybody feels wholly genuine. Watching LaBeouf, you forget his roles in I, Robot, Charlie’s Angels and Constantine (did you ever remember?) and he proves once again that he can carry a film as a leading, albeit flawed, man

Unfortunately, the good work in the tension department that the film had been increasingly ramping up is forsaken for a typical forgettable ill-lit set-piece and loud slashing metallic noises, where the lapses in rational behaviour start to make an irresistible impression on your mind. In fact you start getting maddened that David Morse’s isolated murderer goes on a senseless rampage which allows the filmmakers to give us some gratuitous and ridiculous "shock sights", such as the bodies in the pool of water under the basement. And there’s another problem: the film is not really scary, either. Miles better than Hostel, but not better than The Ring. You will find your heart will beat faster, but nothing to make you jump out of your chair. The film isn’t very cinematic, and I would save watching a kid laze around his house for the small screen. But this film is by no means bad. Aaron Yoo was great, and the moments where he was in peril was when I was on the edge of my seat the most.

Quizás this is a lesson to the Hollywood schlubs who think Gore = Horror

At least the killer wasn’t defeated by a flash bulb.

Grading: B

McLeron